Separation of AC[⊕] Formulas and Circuits
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper gives the first separation between the power of formulas and circuits of equal depth in the AC[⊕] basis (unbounded fan-in AND, OR, NOT and MOD2 gates). We show, for all d(n) ≤ O( logn log logn ), that there exist polynomial-size depth-d circuits that are not equivalent to depth-d formulas of size n (moreover, this is optimal in that n cannot be improved to n). This result is obtained by a combination of new lower and upper bounds for Approximate Majorities, the class of Boolean functions {0, 1} → {0, 1} that agree with the Majority function on 3/4 fraction of inputs. AC[⊕] formula lower bound. We show that every depth-d AC[⊕] formula of size s has a 1/8-error polynomial approximation over F2 of degree O( 1 d log s) d−1. This strengthens a classic O(log s)d−1 degree approximation for circuits due to Razborov [12]. Since the Majority function has approximate degree Θ( √ n), this result implies an exp(Ω(dn1/2(d−1))) lower bound on the depth-d AC[⊕] formula size of all Approximate Majority functions for all d(n) ≤ O(log n). Monotone AC circuit upper bound. For all d(n) ≤ O( logn log logn ), we give a randomized construction of depth-d monotone AC circuits (without NOT or MOD2 gates) of size exp(O(n1/2(d−1))) that compute an Approximate Majority function. This strengthens a construction of formulas of size exp(O(dn1/2(d−1))) due to Amano [1].
منابع مشابه
Separation of AC^0[oplus] Formulas and Circuits
This paper gives the first separation between the power of formulas and circuits of equal depth in the AC[⊕] basis (unbounded fan-in AND, OR, NOT and MOD2 gates). We show, for all d(n) ≤ O( logn log logn ), that there exist polynomial-size depth-d circuits that are not equivalent to depth-d formulas of size n (moreover, this is optimal in that n cannot be improved to n). This result is obtained...
متن کاملCertifying polynomials for AC[⊕] circuits, with applications
In this paper, we introduce and develop the method of certifying polynomials for proving AC[⊕] circuit lower bounds. We use this method to show that Approximate Majority cannot be computed by AC[⊕] circuits of size n. This implies a separation between the power of AC[⊕] circuits of near-linear size and uniform AC[⊕] (and even AC) circuits of polynomial size. This also implies a separation betwe...
متن کاملRecent developments in configuration design and optimization of mineral separation circuits; A Review
The present research reviews two basic approaches for the separation circuit configuration analysis. The first approach is to optimize the circuit configuration. In this method, after a circuit modeling, a variety of search algorithms and mathematical optimization methods are used. Previous works show that this approach has more application in the flotation process. The second approach called t...
متن کاملLecture 4: AC lower bounds and pseudorandomness
Previously we saw how PARITY requires AC circuits of size ≥ 2Ω(n), where d is the circuit depth. The key to the proof was the switching lemma, which intuitively says that random restrictions drastically simplify AC circuits. This immediately gives us that MAJORITY requires AC circuits of size 2Ω(n 1/d), since we can produce a parity circuit out of a majority circuit. At the end of the last lect...
متن کاملStep-Up Switched-Capacitor (SC) AC-DC Converters for RFID Tags
In signal processing circuits of a RDIF tag, the relaxation of restriction concerning operating voltage range enables us to develop various applications. In order to provide higher voltage to the signal processing circuit, two types of step-up AC-DC converters for RFID tags are proposed in this paper: the step-up converter and the step-up converter. To reduce ripple noise of output voltage, the...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017